Parents, educators struggle to prepare for online  classes  
                  South Korea (Korea herald) -- with its high-speed internet  infrastructure and people quick to learn new technologies - may seem like it is  better prepared than any other country to herald in a new era of e-learning.                   
                  
                    
                        | 
                     
                    
                      | --Photo Yonhap | 
                     
         
                                      But, when the government announced that schools, ready or not, have to go  online due to the coronavirus pandemic, many students and teachers were  clueless what to expect. 
   
  “I just don’t have an idea how online classes will go,” Park Kyung-ah, a mother  of two, said. “I don’t think my 9-year-old child can concentrate without me  being at home to check on him,” she added. 
   
                    It has already been a month since her children, aged 9 and 6, last saw their  teachers, as all schools, kindergartens and daycare centers in the country were  closed due to the spread of the novel coronavirus. 
   
                    South Korea decided Tuesday to further extend the closure and shift to online  classes in the biggest distance-learning experiment in the country’s history. 
   
                    Online learning will start in stages, starting April 9 for high school students  first. The first to third graders of elementary schools will start on April  20.  
   
                    It is too early to send students back to classrooms, with daily new infections  still fluctuating around 100 cases, with a growing number of imported cases  from abroad and sporadic clusters of local transmissions, the government said. 
   
                    Parents and teachers The Korea Herald interviewed all agreed that virus risks  are too high for schools to reopen. 
   
                    Yet, online classes will be fraught with challenges, they said. 
   
  “Preparing lunches would be a challenge,” said Park, who has relied on schools  to feed and keeping her children safe, like many other households with both  parents working. “I think I would have to either take more leave or quit my  job.” 
   
                    Parents can send children to “child care classrooms” set up at designated  schools, where a caretaker looks after them during the day, but the service is  not widely used amid safety concerns. 
   
                    According to a survey by the Ministry of Labor and Employment on 500 workers,  42.6 percent of the respondents said they had asked their parents or relatives  to look after their children and only 14.6 percent sent their children to  “child care classrooms” during the closure of the schools. 
   
                    And some homes lack the technological infrastructure needed for online  learning. 
   
  “For a parent like me who has two middle school children, they could go online  taking classes without parents,” said Park Ji-young, working mother whose two  children attend middle school. 
   
  “But I have two children and only one laptop. If they take classes online at  the same time, then I will probably have to rent one. I don’t know whether  schools are prepared for it,” she said. 
   
                    To narrow the study gap arising from accessibility to technology, the  government said it would provide students in low-income families with smart  devices and internet connections starting this week. 
   
                    According to the Ministry of Education’s survey on 67 percent of schools  nationwide, 170,000 students from low-income families did not have smart  devices.  
   
                    The ministry said Wednesday it will lend a total of 316,000 smart devices to  the low-income families -- an estimated 230,000 devices ready for use at  schools nationwide, 50,000 devices owned by the ministry and 36,000 donated by  Samsung Electronics and LG Electronics. The country’s mobile carriers agreed  not to charge those using educational websites and digital textbooks. 
   
                    Parents also worried about children missing out on interacting with their peers  in classrooms and learning social skills. 
   
  “At this point, it is right to begin a semester online without sending children  to school. But my children say they really want to go back to school,” said Lee  Geun-young, mother of fifth-grader in elementary school and third-grader in  middle school. 
   
  “They only liked staying home without going to school at the beginning,” she  said. 
   
                    Confusion is growing among teachers on the front line. 
   
  “We haven’t been preparing and haven’t been informed what online learning will  be like,” said Park Su-ah, who lives in Goyang, Gyeonggi Province, an  elementary school teacher for sixth graders. 
   
  “We don’t know whether we should do it in real-time or whether students will  just download content ... and I don’t know whether students can concentrate. It  is confusing,” she said. 
   
  “I am mostly worried that situations faced by families, teachers and schools  all vary,” she said. “There are also families without smart devices and  teachers who are not familiar at all with the internet or smart education.” 
   
                    Another teacher based in Daegu, who only gave his surname Noh and teaches first  graders in high school, said he is concerned that he has to greet his students  starting their high school life online.  
   
  “I have not formed any rapport with them as we begin the semester online,” he  said. “Students don’t know me and I don’t know them. … I am wondering whether I  can offer them classes and assignments customized for their academic level. 
   
                    The number of students at elementary, middle and high schools is estimated at  5.4 million as of last year - number of teachers is 497,000.  
                  Headlinew3: Bangkok orders shop closures from midnight to 5am  
                    BANGKOK (The Straits times/ANN) -- All Bangkok’s shops, including  convenience stores and supermarkets, will have to close from midnight to 5am,  while all parks have to be shut effective Thursday (April 2) until at least  April 30, the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration (BMA) announced on Wednesday  (April 1).  
  “Please understand that we need to reduce the gathering of people  as much as possible. There will be regular assessments of all the closed  venues. If scientific and medical evidence indicates that they are safe to  reopen, we will consider it,” said BMA spokesman Pongsakorn Kwanmuang.  
                    The order is the latest in the series of gradual closures of  various venues and restrictions in Bangkok and most parts of Thailand,  following the March 26 declaration of a state of emergency, which gives the  government absolute power in times of crisis.  
                    Bangkok has already closed its schools, universities, malls,  dine-in restaurants, sports venues, spas, gyms, salons, cinemas, theatres, and  many other places since mid-March. The capital has seen a sharp spike in  infection cases of the coronavirus, which has now spread to another 60 of the  country’s 77 provinces.   
                    Most provinces with confirmed cases have ordered similar closures  and restrictions, but at their own pace with their own specifications - ranging  from Buddha amulet shops, to cattle markets, shrimp fishing ponds, and weight  loss clinics - signalling a clear decentralisation in the Thai government’s  handling of the Covid-19 outbreak.  
                    Thailand has 1,771 Covid-19 cases and 12 deaths as of Wednesday.  
                    Tourist hotspot Phuket island was the first province of the  current four provinces to have issued a soft indefinite nighttime curfew  between 8pm to 3am since Saturday (March 28). Only “asking for cooperation,”  there has yet to be a penalty for breaking the curfew. But an order issued  under the emergency decree has banned all kinds of gathering, with a maximum  imprisonment of two years.  
                    Apart from closing its beaches, zoos and walking streets, the  southern island has also sealed off its land and sea access, with a plan to  close its airport from April 10.  
                    The nighttime curfews and closures are meant to deter people from  partying, which could increase the spread of the virus, officials said.   
                    Even without a confirmed infection, provinces like Sakon Nakhon in  the northeast have banned the sale of alcohol from Tuesday (March 31) until at  least mid-April.  
  “People tend to gather when they drink. Many youngsters like to  hang out just outside convenience stores and drink,” said Mr Pipat Ekpapan ,  governor of Phitsanulok province in the north, which is also banning alcohol  sales for the entire April, with a maximum sentence of one year.  
                    For Nonthaburi province which is adjacent to Bangkok and has, at  104, the highest number of cases after the capital which has 850 cases, a  curfew from 11pm to 5am has been imposed indefinitely since Tuesday, in  addition to some closures. But a complete lockdown is out of the question,  considering that most of its residents work in Bangkok.  
  “There has yet to be a need for a complete lockdown. I believe the  situation is still under control,” said Nonthaburi governor Sujin Chaichumsak,  citing various measures implemented in the province such as temperature  checkpoints on the roads with health officials ready to treat those found to  have symptoms.  
                    Responding to the concern people may not take the recommended  curfew seriously, Mr Sujin said: “Now there’s hardly anyone leaving their homes  anyway. It is not a concern at all.”  
                    The three Muslim-majority deep south provinces bordering Malaysia  - Yala, Pattani and Narathiwat - have imposed a lockdown since Sunday, with no  travel in and out of each province permitted. This came after infections of the  locals joining a big religious gathering at a mosque just outside Kuala Lumpur  at the end of February.  
  “I’m surprised that this government is decentralised in its  management. It may be a good thing as each area of Thailand has geographical  differences. It is too soon to tell now if all the measures have been  effective,” said epidemiologist Dr Weerasak Jongsuwiwanwong.  
                   
                  (Latest Update April 02, 2020)[6:09 PM]
  |